17 - Last Voices of the assembly - Clarifications on some reviews, On Friday July 27 entry all live one day very confusing. Nobody wanted an end to the Assembly as we played experiencing. Neither CCT nor basic, nor who approved the draft agreement by conviction, nor those who did so tired, neither rejected it out of friendship, nor rejected it out of conviction, nor that it did, nor that no was. Let's be clear: "No phone wanted to complete the assembly of the way it ended." On the other hand, in case anyone did not notice, that afternoon there was no "report" Assembly (we learned when we went to get a copy of it).
We are also tired. Remember that besides being CCT-stop, mobilization, and undertake all measures of force along the set of "all" the phone from more than 100 days has a tent set up at the door of his building, and cover rotating shifts on call 24 hours a day. Have no doubt that "more tired than us no one" and if this deal really was the "only way" the right thing would have been at least discuss it (if the claim is democracy, right?).
Regardless of the result obtained in the Assembly on Friday, in favor of the Pre-agreement or not, what we want for all the entry is to ensure "the success of it." We speak of legal form, not results. This is something we deserve. And this is something that did not happen.
result is not what we're talking about. In a free Assembly is won or lost, but accept what the majority says. There is debate, dialogue, consultation, negotiation. We understand as "union democracy", and that is what we expect from our driving. That
want from our union. For that partake of it. Now, let's review the development of the last two meetings they come every entry to see clearly that we mean by democracy:
Development Assembly on Monday 23/07/2007: * Open.
* Members of the Conduct sets out its position.
* opens the debate to begin submitting motions (as the driving can not motions, as indicated by the statutes of Assembly).
* Approval of the motion to reject the Pre-agreement.
* Approval of the motion of acceptance.
* opens the list of speakers: about 7 or 8 colleagues present their ideas.
* A basic telephony partner intends to finalize the list of speakers and voting. Approving the motion and proceed to vote the same. Accepts most.
* proceeds to vote on the 2 motions: 1) reject the Pre-agreement, 2) acceptance of the draft agreement.
* Repeat voting for the emergence of some doubts.
* Win the motion to reject the Pre-agreement. (90% approximately).
* how was motioned to continue the crackdown.
2 mates expose their ideas.
* the motion is voted on how to continue the crackdown. It accepts about 97%.
* We reread the minutes of what was voted in the Assembly.
* Closure of the Assembly.
Call: With 4 days in advance, in person, via web and via mail. With publication of the draft agreement for discussion in the Assembly.
Incident: for admission Poor organization, two different records to enter (CCT division and Basic), 3 hour delay in the beginning, the presence of retired phone (supporting the same as all present: heat, delays, etc.). .
During the Assembly: Jeers, cheers. All quiet at the point of order.
Close: Conduction and peers are removed without problems.
Development of the Assembly on Monday 27/07/2007: * Open.
* The Conduct sets out its position and asked the Assembly who agrees, who rejected and who abstains.
* Closure of the Assembly.
Call: 17 hours ago via web, via mail, and personally in a "few" buildings. Without the publication, in any case, the amendments of the draft agreement earlier.
Incident: Poor organization for income, two minutes and two separate doors to enter (CCT and Lower Division) and two provisions: the CST above the popular, the basic down in the pit. Discussion by this provision; struggles. After a while, reorganize two doors, but the locations are free. Two-hour delay to the start of the Assembly. Without the presence of retired phone.
During the meeting: Nothing. Close
: Conduction is removed escorted by police amid shouts, blows and flying chairs for the stage.
To reflect together: 1) The position of Call Center is not point to that vote against or fight them. Quite the contrary. We have always sought unity, and that is why we did not agree with "separate vote", which is why agreed not to "enter through different doors." Because otherwise, as we read in a comment, would be right to do a union on our own because it always gives us a different treatment (neither better nor worse than).
However, we are also phone. And our agreement, despite being well below the basic agreement, the agreement is also a telephone. Therefore
born this page, so the first points (1 to 7) of this area, explained: our situation, the composition of our wages, our daily work, user information, images and contact. Because we want you to know the "why" of our struggle.
insist on this point: that a shock-end assembly is not something that anyone proud. Open conflict that we average $ 170 cut our pay in commissions to close the deal, and that everything remains exactly as it is not something we should be proud. 2) Why CCT puts a tent in front of your building? In the rest of the buildings if anyone raised in assembly would be something like laughing matter and it would be automatically rejected by the majority.
3) Driving the CST for this is "according to the circumstances of the moment:" the most beaten of Telecom, and our commitment to improve their working conditions "or well: "anarchist trade union, or better," the southpaw "," the lunatics. " 4) While everyone is going for a raise, we accompany the entry, but we also need that we are not able to increase down to the next month. Able to leave on vacation without discounts, to get sick without guilt or salary reduction.
would be great tomorrow in a conflict to say (taking only the point of salary increase), "We went for a 25% and only got 16%." For us, the balance is: we went for a 25% and only got 16%. We dropped points from June to July at $ 170, and do not know how much more can be downloaded from here end of the year, and if we get sick we lose sales of physical units that day, and if we went on vacation we will have to continue to juggle or do not spend much because the return is complicated. The CST lunatics live this reality every day, and those who can not see it will, inevitably, away from common sense. 5) It is only the CCT who was to claim the stage. Unfortunately (insist on speaking in these terms, since no one celebrates it happened) had partners from all sectors in the post closing battle Assembly. And not only those who rejected the draft agreement, many raised their hands and approved the agreement were also there. 6) No look down on those who think like us. Luckily for all entry, most are in basic conventions and agreements not in Call Center. Do not point out who voted to approve the draft agreement as it is clear to all entry, this agreement is not the best.
After understanding this point, we can discuss, negotiate or discuss whether to approve the draft agreement. But not to endorse with the complicity of silence that many anonymous farce designated "Democratic Assembly of Workers."
Then:
Is Right: * Rosario was alone, and it was very difficult to keep a fight alone. Perhaps the best thing is been approve this agreement and return to work.
* We all get tired a lot in this fight. * It was a dedición
reasonable to contemplate the adoption agreement.
wrong: * That the majority has voted in favor of the draft agreement. And the video will go up soon so they can observe, but is too uneven. We can not talk anymore of "vast majority" or even "most", nor equality, nor minority.
* NO RECOUNT WAS, and do not know who won. You do not know.
* In 2005, very similar to an assembly, there was a similar situation, but became back, vote, and accepted the agreement by a small difference. Here we have even that. In 2005 the dissatisfied were just us, this time were much more dissatisfied with an Assembly that calls itself free. We
conscience and, unfortunately, and unlike many, an empty purse. Call
Focus
callcentrados@gmail.com