Take a look at this before the movie: http://www.cartelera10.com/cine-independiente/in-the-loop-la-comedia-politica-de-la-decada.html
criticism is very enthusiastic. He says interesting things but has, in my opinion, a major failure.
Read:
"The story blasts directed against a problem that all suffer and we close our eyes destination countries choose to do immoral things, fools and whose only interest is themselves ." Here are
much naivete in the commentary. Ianucci see that is capable of acquiring, from comedy, internal logic of the functioning of international relations (much like Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove) but our "political education" should allow us to see what fits these logics, which its limits. THIS IS THE QUESTION THAT I WANT TO, Answer After the movie.
To give you a clue. See the text of Immanuel Wallerstein (googleleadlo if you do not know who he is), the reasons for the attack on Iraq: http://fbc.binghamton.edu/105-sp-rn.htm
See at 17:45 in cubes.
Forward this to others please
Regards, Paul
